Welcome Visitor. First time here? Like what you see? Bookmark us for when you are bored, and check out 'top shots' and 'fantastic (editors choice)' in the menu above, you won't be dissapointed. Join our community! click here to sign up for an account today. Sick of this message? Get rid of it by logging-in here.



I never really understood why a railroad would take a perfectly usable unit and turn it into a “B” unit, but maybe there is more to the story than what I know. I understand the former NS units as they were not Canadian approved leaders and had high short hoods but these units were originally standard “A” units. Thus day in Welland I finally was able to shoot one that was not nose coupled so I took the opportunity. Note the missing ditch lights and blanked out windows. That summer I even found a fully “beaver” painted one out west. They were neat units nonetheless.
Copyright Notice: This image ©Marcus W Stevens all rights reserved.



Caption: I never really understood why a railroad would take a perfectly usable unit and turn it into a “B” unit, but maybe there is more to the story than what I know. I understand the former NS units as they were not Canadian approved leaders and had high short hoods but these units were originally standard “A” units. Thus day in Welland I finally was able to shoot one that was not nose coupled so I took the opportunity. Note the missing ditch lights and blanked out windows. That summer I even found a fully “beaver” painted one out west. They were neat units nonetheless.

Photographer:
Marcus W Stevens [1069] (more) (contact)
Date: 01/28/2002 (search)
Railway: Canadian Pacific (search)
Reporting Marks: CP 5762 (search)
Train Symbol: Not Provided
Subdivision/SNS: Hamilton subdivision (search)
City/Town: Welland (search)
Province: Ontario (search)
Share Link: http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=51060
Click here to Log-in or Register and add your vote.

17 Favourites
Photographers like Gold.Log-in or Register to show appreciation
View count: 1020 Views

Share this image on Facebook, Twitter or email using the icons below
Photo ID: 49769

Sorry, there is no map for this photo. Photographer did not add GPS co-ordinates. Please add next time or ask for a correction to this photo.



All comments must be positive in nature and abide by site rules. Anything else may be removed without warning.

11 Comments
  1. I’ve wondered about that myself. My guess, I wonder if they did it to well used cab interiors. It’s a cheap fix to a mechanically sound unit with a worn out operator station. :-)
    Nice that you got a caboose in the photo for 2002.

  2. Are the numbers crooked? My question is if the former NS units had dual controls.

  3. I believe all the ex NS units were set up long hood forward.

  4. FWIW: My understanding is that this was to accommodate the RC equipment after the “Robot Cars” were phased out, but while there was still a distinction between the equipment required for a unit to be a “master” or a “slave”. I bet if you look through some old shots of SDs as “robots” after the “robot cars” were phased out, there will be one of these in the consist.

  5. Thanks Matt, that does make sense. I believe many of these were also renumbered as well. At least they added some variety either way to a consist.

  6. You’d still see these B-units on CP into the early 2010s.

  7. CP turned some of these units into ‘B’ units so they didn’t have to maintain the cabs as per transport Canada and teamsters union operating requirements. So basically no radio, upgraded seats, fridge, hot plate, toilet etc… the controls and basic seats are still in the locos for hostling only. Hope that helps

  8. Thanks everyone for the clarification

  9. Thanks for sharing this. I don’t think that I have ever seen a shot of one not coupled to anything.

  10. These were done to reduce costs associated with maintaining the cabs on certain SD40-2 units that were set up as Locotrol reciever/slave units for mid-train robot operation.

    One source mentioned some of the early conversions had equipment placed in the cab making them unsuitable to lead (but initially didn’t have windows plated over, just markings applied to the cabs). When more SD40-2 units were converted into robots with Locotrol gear removed from robot cars (unknown of they were putting the equipment in the nose by then) they had windows blanked, ditch lights removed, and class lights plated over to avoid maintaining them as leaders, effectively converting them into B-units.

    Some did get converted back into leaders in later years, others didn’t.

  11. Thanks Dan for more clarity.

Railpictures.ca © 2006-2024 all rights reserved. Photographs are copyright of the photographer and used with permission
Terms and conditions | About us